Suggestions wanted: Forum posting guidelines

mbieweng
Posts: 341
Joined: 2006-10-31
Dad Points: 1088

More than one person has contacted me recently about the content in the discussion forums. My general philosophy to this point as been that (1) we are all adults, (2) adults are capable of acting like adults, and thus (3) there do not need to be any particular "official rules", other than common sense, regarding content or conduct, nor any censorship efforts.

Perhaps that is working satisfactorily, perhaps not.

In any case, in the interest of making this site the best that it can be, I'd like to open up this topic for reconsideration and solicit some suggestions. So...

1) Do we need any rules or guidelines for what can/should be posted or any other related issues? Why or why not? If so, what should they be?

2) Do we need (more) moderating to redirect and/or delete posts as necessary? Why or why not?

Let's hear your ideas. Keep it friendly, please.

Thanks!

-Mike



JPhillip
JPhillip's picture
Posts: 646
Joined: 2006-11-17
Dad Points: 924
Honestly.

The only thing I can say is "No posting of nude photos." And, excessive profanity should be strongly discouraged.

Other than that, we are all adults.

Has participation on this site increased recently or decreased? I suspect it has increased dramatically.



mbieweng
Posts: 341
Joined: 2006-10-31
Dad Points: 1088
Increased

Yes, it's increased dramatically over the last year and especially the last few months.



distatica
Posts: 66
Joined: 2007-10-22
Dad Points: 81
Kind of tricky

One thing I would say, is wait until you get a feel for people, until you've talked to someone for a while before you start poking any (even playful ) fun at them, since you really don't know how people would feel about anything. But this is tact, and a little difficult to make a rule, since some people seem to be better at it than others. I myself excel in this area, and if you weren't a bunch of assholes you'd see it my way too.

.....

Please tell me you caught that joke, flame me and die.

I second no nude photos, those can be sent directly to me, and why the heck did anyone get poor Mike in on this?



paddyrat
paddyrat's picture
Posts: 189
Joined: 2007-08-13
Dad Points: 249
I read Playboy for the articles...

What about "tasteful" nudes???

Seriously, I enjoy the community on this site more than anything and I feel that maybe it's being cooped up this winter that has given all of us all the slappy's (which has led to many a strange posting). As this site grows and develops, we shouldn't lose the sense of community that it provides. Where else can a group of AHD's congregate and act like a group of AHM's? Right here, of course.
Mike is doing a great job of allowing us into the sandbox to play, so maybe a little bit of self governing is better than coming down on guys like the SS of the Third Reich. If someone has a question or just feels like he needs to relate to someone with similar duties, I say let him. If someone misbehaves, we put them in a cage match with TickTock at the convention, and... PRESTO, problem solved!

I do want to make one suggestion on possibly improving the randomness of some of the threads. It seems to me that at one time or another (maybe even now), we all have a skill that led us into responsible adulthood and managed to ride that skill right up until we ditched it for greener pastures. There is such a diverse group of guys here (Doctors, Lawyers and Indian Chiefs, so to speak) why not try to harness some of that knowledge by starting a section called "ask the (so-called) expert". It would be helpful if I needed an answer about kitchen knives or nuclear physics answered by a guy on this site who was the resident "expert" without wading through all of the "smarty-pants" answers in the general discussion area. (Before you throw fruit at me, I like smarty-pants answers, so don't stop). Maybe set up a list of choices and have whatever the choice is, say construction or plumbing, or electrical work and have that thread swing through my profile (as a licensed general contractor, I'm a "so-called expert" in those fields) and I'd be happy to help in any way I can. Remember, I swing a hammer, so maybe the technical logistics are way beyond my comprehension, (my computer skills give me AHD.org, Email and porn) but certainly we have someone in here that can make it work? It may be that much more rewarding to log into AHD.org someday to find some comraderie, share a joke, and get an answer about changing diapers, writing a book, or fixing your sink. Just a suggestion.

Aye, there's nary an animal alive that can outrun a greased scotsman...



ticktock
ticktock's picture
Posts: 673
Joined: 2006-11-06
Dad Points: 1157
I don't think posts should

I don't think posts should be threatening, nor should they drift too far into being personally insulting (your baby is ugly).

I don't think trolls should be tolerated- people with the goal of creating chaos on the forum by purposefully being insulting and antagonistic (for the record it hasn't happened here yet).

I think spam threads should be deleted or locked.

I would hate it here if there were mods dictating what is acceptable content or locking threads liberally. I try to make it a rule to say things here that I would say to someone's face. I would hate somebody to shut down my actual conversations just as I would hate it if they were to control my online discussions.

Issues of drama, such as our current argument, should be handled with PMs. Like, "Colin, I received some complaints that you were mean. Can you cut it out and apologize?" or whatever. I would feel much more comfortable with that than "This thread is locked because you all are acting like babies." Glad that hasn't happened here ever, though I'm sure it's come close.



dayv27
dayv27's picture
Posts: 349
Joined: 2006-11-03
Dad Points: 569
Categorys

I know other boards allow splitting the threads into categorys so that if I don't want to read about threads related to Alabama, I don't even have to see them.

Is there a way to split the baord into folders of "Actual parenting stuff", "Random threads about coffee and hobbies", and a folder for "naked pictures, discussions of sex toys, or post here to argue with eachother"

Otherwise, I'd just say leave it as it is and smack knuckles as neccessary.

www.athomedadconvention.com



distatica
Posts: 66
Joined: 2007-10-22
Dad Points: 81
Already implimented

There is already different sections. The thing is most people might be reading "What's new at AtHomeDad.org" which doesn't show which categories posts are in. I am unsure of this, since I don't know the layout of this site from the back, but it might take extensive hacking to make it so posts in those other categories didn't show up in the What's New area.

This would:
a) Be more work than is needed, not really fair to Mike,
b) be annoying, since I often rely on that area to inform me of who's talking about what and where, it's doubtful I am going to go through each category looking for new posts. Don't know about the rest of you, but I bet that's common.

I think that making a post heading as obvious as possible, should be enough for most sensible individuals to determine if they want to read it or not. If you are offended by sex, and you click on SEX TOYS!!! then we have bigger problems to fix than the forums.



mbieweng
Posts: 341
Joined: 2006-10-31
Dad Points: 1088
Categories

There are already different discussion forums that serve as "categories". They are easy to add/delete/change. The problem is that everyone mostly puts everything into the "general discussion" forum. Maybe this is because the available forums aren't useful, or maybe is because it's lazy/easy to put it in "general discussion". I have also been lazy in moving posts around to put them in the appropriate forums.

The different forums show up when you click on "discussions" at the top. They are also available when you create a new post (http://www.athomedad.org/node/add/forum) - there's a drop down list near the top.

Take a look at the list, and let me know if some different forums would be more useful.

Separately, in addition to the different discussion forums, it's also possible to tag or categorize any post with any other sort of additional categorization system or systems. For example, at the moment, new posts can be tagged with a state if they're particularly relevant to that state (it's in a drop down list when you create a new post.) I can enable other types of categorization systems if we think it would be useful.

Right now, I'm still also interested in the guidelines/rules type of stuff from the original post. So, please continue with the suggestions on that if you have any.

Thanks.



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
Remember the Cause

I think it is important to remember that this is not just another 'guys hanging out' message board.

This is billed as 'THE SAHD OASIS'. This is the place those of us who get media calls refer them to regarding SAHDs. This is the place we refer new SAHDs.

If all the recent posts are filled with snarky, sarcastic, inside-joke insults at the time a person visits, that person will form their opinion of SAHDs based on that. If it is a reporter, no big snot, I guess, but if it is a new SAHD or potential SAHD, then we have done him a disservice, as we have misrepresented what SAHDs are all about. To him, the oasis was a mirage.

There are also guys who will turn tail and run after seeing the vibrator discussion without fair warning. There are guys with the site up during the day with 2-3 year olds (not to mention grade school kids) who can read the 'SEX TOYS' title on the recent posts banner. That might be enough for them not to come back.

Maybe a realignment of the forums is necessary. There are an awful lot of posts in General. Like Dayv said, maybe an 'Adult' Forum for the sex issue type stuff. Shoot, maybe even have a 'Coliseum' forum where we can flame each other freely. If two guys get grumpy, the mod can say -- take this to the Coliseum!

There have been a lot of posts since the original forums were created. There is now a lot of info to look at to evaluate them. I doubt major changes are needed. Mods, though, are needed to make sure the correct forums are used. This will be doubly important if the ranks continue to grow.

I advocate moderation, not censorship. Simple rules -- stay on topic and in forum -- don't instigate -- no personal attacks -- no advocating illegal acts. Some guidelines -- use the right forum -- emoticon -- limit swearing -- stick to the site definition of the line of bad taste regarding photos and links.

While this is a considered a public forum, it is owned by Mike, who is more than allowed to regulate the content.

I went overboard in the music thread, mostly because I am a jerk, but also because guys jumping on DKremers for his taste in music touched a nerve, and I imagined what that would look like from a new guy's perspective, especially a fan of the boy bands. It does not read as joking as much as you guys seem to think. I thought I should let it fly and see what might come of it.

When it comes to this cause, I believe I have earned the right to sit upon the high horse when I feel it needs defending.

-Jim L
2008 SAHD Fishing Trip:
www.sahdsfish.4t.com



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
BTW

I am a big fan of the pop culture type threads and the joke threads. Those are things that help build the community.



Gaming with Baby
Gaming with Baby's picture
Posts: 433
Joined: 2007-08-15
Dad Points: 618
Alrighty then

Well, I thought I'd start in the "recent activity" thread, but I'll begin here and mosey on over that way.

The issue of moderation is always an interesting topic. In one manner or another I have been moderator, dictator, and instigator on literally hundreds (if not thousands) of message boards from the long gone days of dial up BBS to today's pHpbb systems. Somewhere, at some time, this topic always comes up.

Moderation is incredibly difficult. It's a bit like opening Pandora's Box. Once you've open up that task, there's no going back or running from it. As I said before in another thread, AtHomeDad.org is the only outlet that many of us have. As such, if we are being true to ourselves, we cuss, and joke, and talk about our "friends" need for sex toys, and any of the other things that tickle or fancy because that's who we are in real life. Is everyone going to be pleased by this? Absolutely not. But as the saying goes, you can't please all the folks all the time.

The short and simple answer as far as I'm concerned is that there is no need for moderation here. We are adults. If members have a problem with something said, or has question as to what is implied, deal with it one on one. There is no need to air that out publicly. You only succeed in making yourself look foolish, bringing down the board, and opening up a can that needn't be opened.

The one problem I do see here is the need for reorganization or a straight up redesign. I will admit that this is the best laid out site of all the SAHD/Dad boards out there, but it ain't saying much. The forum structure doesn't make much sense to me and is difficult to negotiate. Hence the reason why so many topics get posted in General Discussion area and not elsewhere. That and cooped up with the boy all day sometimes I just want to talk to other poor souls that are in the same situation that I'm in.

-Will
http://www.gamingwithbaby.com all your diapers are belong to us
fatdadcooking.com coming soon!
my flickr



New No.2
New No.2's picture
Posts: 478
Joined: 2007-11-12
Dad Points: 682
Wall Street Journal Factor.

In terms of accurate and unbiased reporting The Wall Street Journal has my vote for best American News Paper. But…I am a Democrat and I skip the editorials if they start to upset me or I disagree with them in such a way as to not want to make me keep reading. I don’t want to give the Journal up so I am selective. I am also selective about the threads on this site. If something is not to my liking I click on another thread.

If all of this is stemming from the Sex Toys thread I can’t disagree more as to it’s relevance on this site. We are men, and men are not open and candid with each other when it comes to asking for help in this department. Many of us live in out of the way, or rural areas, where stores carrying erotica are not as easily located. (Or if they are we are uncomfortable going to them.) I for one was happy to see other men discussing keeping the fires lit in their monogamous relationship with their partner or spouse.

More than once I have turned to my anon friends via this board for support when I knew of no other place to get it. (Please see my Feeling Low post.) Not to mention we all helped out Manhattandad when he was in crisis and, I think, felt we were going to be rude to him.

I agree we drift a little now and then but I can face up to the fact I have a lot of time to fill and posting about Batman or movies and such helps me feel in the loop with other men who have the same “job” as I do.

Be Seeing You.
Jonathan



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
What's New ...

I think the coolest feature of the board, the new topic bar, is also part of the problem. I know that, personally, I almost never visit the forums page, because it is way easier to use the shortcuts to the right. I rarely know what forum I am in. If I were making a new thread, I would probably check, but if the current thread was a similar topic, I'd assume it was in the right place.

If it's OK to have 80% of the posts in General, then why does Mike even need to develop other forums? Just have one big free-for-all forum. I don't think that works too well.

There sure is not a need for a censoring gestapo mod, but a little housekeeping (moving threads) and occasional warning to a guy who might be crossing lines is certainly appropriate. Side conversations when someone pops off because they are under too much stress would also help build the community.

GWB, I don't get what you mean by 'there is no turning back' from adding mods. I know bad mods can wreck a site just as much as members getting out of control. The answer is to get good mods and give them clear instructions as to what they are supposed to do. Admin can certainly remove mods.

As far as the 'we are all adults' reason for not needing moderation, adults do stupid things all the time. Not every negative act is a childish one. Adults are more capable of more harm than kids could even think up. Even those with good intentions.

Self-regulating is fine, but what gives someone standing to call someone out in the name of bad taste? Age? More kids? More posts? Longer AHD? Dad points? Bigger schlong? The answer is, noone has standing over anyone, except the owner. Mods speak for the owner so that he doesn't have to deal with any of our crap. A mod can address a situation from the outside, objectively, with only the site's rules in mind.

Telling each other what to do makes things worse. We don't have a good PM system here, either, to quickly pop off a message. The contact form thing is good for a note, but then you are into your e-mail instead of on the site.

This place is like a billboard on the internet for SAHDs. Do we really want dildos and petty arguments on our billboard?

2008 SAHD Fishing Trip:
www.sahdsfish.4t.com



Tim E
Tim E's picture
Posts: 117
Joined: 2006-11-13
Dad Points: 171
Do we really want...

Jim L wrote:
>>"Do we really want dildos on our billboard?

You're absolutely right Jim, you should leave ....... :-)

Tim
- taking an easy one....



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
ROFL

2008 SAHD Fishing Trip:
www.sahdsfish.4t.com



ticktock
ticktock's picture
Posts: 673
Joined: 2006-11-06
Dad Points: 1157
.

"This place is like a billboard on the internet for SAHDs. Do we really want dildos and petty arguments on our billboard?"

That's the second time you've made an allusion to the discussion forum being representative of at-home Dads. The discussion forum is just a place to talk with each other. It isn't a pep rally for AHDs.

A forum has many moving parts. It is made up of various types of people with various interests, behaviors, and opinions. Putting aside the fact that the issues of dildos and petty arguments were polled and that the majority didn't care, what gives any one person the right to declare what messages go on the AHD "billboard". Who are you to say what represents the average Dad? Who are you to start writing our billboard to please your own sense of identity?

"Self-regulating is fine, but what gives someone standing to call someone out in the name of bad taste? Age? More kids? More posts? Longer AHD? Dad points? Bigger schlong?"

Oh brother. This is the type of mod-nazi shit that you claim won't happen with mods. What gives someone the right to call someone out on bad taste? The fact that he is a human and an American. What gives you or your potential mod-police the standing to say that someone's opinion is unfair and unworthy of discussion? Call me an asshole all you want. I could care less. But don't try to control a forum because you disagree with my message or how I deliver it.

You've got it in your head that this place will be ruined by open and honest conversation. Wrong. It will be ruined by this type of over-analyzing of opinions and attitudes that are different than yours. Learn to live in a world where people are free to be snarky, kind, belligerent, honest, funny, intelligent, stupid, and any other adjective you can imagine. That is what a discussion forum is all about. That part of the site is a place to discuss things, not a place for AHD public relations. Go to rebeldad.com for cheerleading. Go to the discussion forums to discuss.



Gaming with Baby
Gaming with Baby's picture
Posts: 433
Joined: 2007-08-15
Dad Points: 618
Thank you ticktock

I started to respond, but for some reason decided to refresh and saw that most of what I was going to say you just covered. My response will have to wait though, Butters is waking up.

-Will
http://www.gamingwithbaby.com all your diapers are belong to us
fatdadcooking.com coming soon!
my flickr



JPhillip
JPhillip's picture
Posts: 646
Joined: 2006-11-17
Dad Points: 924
Coincidence?

Tim, et al,

Did you guys know that "DILDO" spelled backwards is "ODLID?" I bet you didn't. Well, do you know why that is significant? I didn't think you did.

"ODLID" is an acronym for "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denosivich." See http://www.acronymfinder.com/acronym.aspx?rec={0E6AB1D6-4782-4E41-901D-8615343B36EC}

"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" is a story by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, originally published in November 1962 in the Soviet literary magazine Novy Mir. It is set in a Soviet labor camp in the 1950s, and describes a single day for an ordinary prisoner, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov. Its appearance was an extraordinary event in Soviet literary history—never before had such an account of "Stalinist repression" been openly distributed.
See http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/One+Day+in+the+Life+of+Ivan+Denisovich.

Coincidence, Gentleman? I think not!



matt.redsquirrel
matt.redsquirrel's picture
Posts: 296
Joined: 2008-01-07
Dad Points: 503
JPhillip

You are fine piece of work. I bet your wife has a hard time keeping up with you.

North Carolina Dad's Group
http://lindsaybeans.blogspot.com
http://oneredsquirrelinstatesville.blogspot.com



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
Well, my opinion is ...

that the forums need more structure.

From the beginning, I and others were led to believe that this was the site somehow chosen to replace Slowlane as the main presence of the SAHD community on the internet.

I am not making that up. Whether it came from Mike or whether the message was distorted through the grapevine, I do not know. This is the site hooked up with the convention, too, which gives it status. THE Oasis.

Should there be an ability for free for all posting and adult discussion and ragging on your buds? Absolutely.

But here, where the content is largely driven by the message board posts, I worry about the perception of SAHDs. Why worry about an obscure blog by a naive reporter when our own web site projects a negative image anyway.

I Googled SAHD Forum, and it led to this post -- http://www.athomedad.org/node/1795 -- the infamous plug for distatica's web site. That thread was awful.

Do you not even see that your criticism of my stating my opinion that the site could use structure and should project a positive image is as much censorship as anything I have stated. I am for the free exchange of ideas/opinions/whatever. I am not for the extreme/potentially controversial opinions headlining the main page under 'What's New at AHD.org'.

Regarding the polls, the responses are low, and by the people who have been having the conversations. I'd like to hear from the 32 guests online right now, assuming they are not all bots, to see what they think of all this. Those are the votes that matter, and those could be the SAHDs that are being discouraged from reaching out here.

About the 'standing' issue that you quoted, I was obviously out of line in the music thread, because I thought the posts on DKremers were out of line. Ten guys could have piled on telling me how wrong I was. I would have probably told them to pound sand, because I thought I was right. But if a mod shot me a message saying I should back off there, I would respect it. If a mod deleted my spaz out, I would understand. (I actually had a post deleted last night. Don't talk to me about mod-nazi shit -- it was something borderline but kind of funny. I understand the zap.)

I am not trying to control anything, and my identity is fine, thanks. I see this web site as much more important than you do, apparently, and it seemed to me it is heading south. Forums are dynamic entities like you said. For this reason, though, we should be responsible for making sure the board stays in line with what the site stands for.

I have been in forums as long as they have been, when every page started with a blinking cursor. I have seen these issues cycle through countless groups. I assume GWB knows what I am talking about. Sometimes, members run a board into the ground. Sometimes mods drive people away. I think we are better than that here, and I would think a compromise would be reached. Sometimes, people get together and reinvent a group and it thrives. Maybe we are not headed there yet, but I would bet it is not far off.

While posts are there proclaiming how loud 'we' are and how much 'we' are going to drink at the convention, 'we' need to remember, I'd think, that the quiet guy who doesn't drink and is shy might be discouraged from attending the convention or even posting an important question to the board. That is a far bigger tragedy than any bickering here.

I just think the wheat should be separated from the chaff, so to speak, so that someone coming here in need of help can find it, while the venting, ranting, and BS has its place too.



mbieweng
Posts: 341
Joined: 2006-10-31
Dad Points: 1088
Yet another poll

Ok, there's yet another poll on this topic. Please go vote:

http://www.athomedad.org/node/2234

Thanks



randyfielding
randyfielding's picture
Posts: 314
Joined: 2007-02-05
Dad Points: 351
My Two Cents

First of all, that was quite the piece of literary allusion by JPhilip. ;-)

The sex toys discussion was very appropriate for this board in my opinion since sex is a very important part of any relationship, especially the long-term relationships that most of us -- if not all of us -- are in. If you can't ask other men about this type of stuff, then I don't know who you can ask. And I really don't think that anyone searching for "sex toys" on google is going to really spend any kind of significant time browsing our site. Also, I talked to my wife about this kind of post. She frequents mommy boards, and she told me that posts like this are very common. If our girlfriends and wives think it's OK to talk about, then it should be more than OK for us to talk about it.

I agree with everything that Colin said in his last post. We don't want to go down a path of moderation that will have a negative affect on the message boards. However, I do think there are appropriate places for a moderator: (1) when posts are obviously in a wrong category, (2) when spam hits the site, (3) when people are being downright nasty to each other, and (4) when someone requests the assistance of a moderator for any of the above. Besides that, we should all be man enough here to realize that we should all be treated with respect and dignity.

Randy
Cincinnati, OH
SAHD to Ryder (23 months)



JPhillip
JPhillip's picture
Posts: 646
Joined: 2006-11-17
Dad Points: 924
You're right.

Matt,
That's why I need you buddy. Welcome back. Now, where's that MF ?

Ps. MF is your other buddy, MegaFun. Not MadaFokker.



randyfielding
randyfielding's picture
Posts: 314
Joined: 2007-02-05
Dad Points: 351
RE: Well, my opinion is ...

Jim L wrote:
I am for the free exchange of ideas/opinions/whatever. I am not for the extreme/potentially controversial opinions headlining the main page under 'What's New at AHD.org'.

Do you not see how you are constantly contradicting yourself in your own thoughts. You can't have it both ways, my friend.

Jim L wrote:
From the beginning, I and others were led to believe that this was the site somehow chosen to replace Slowlane as the main presence of the SAHD community on the internet. ... Regarding the polls, the responses are low, and by the people who have been having the conversations.

So you were sold on something that didn't quite turn out the way you imagined it when the site first began? Oh well. As the site membership has grown, so has the site activity, and so has the number of opinions. Mike has most graciously made this site a democracy and given us all a voice. And, according to the polls, your opinion is in the minority. Therefore, you can continue to preach to the wind, or you can attempt to transform yourself as the forum itself transforms.

Jim L wrote:
I am not trying to control anything,...

I am more than happy to hear and acknowledge your opinion, but you cannot possibly be serious in saying this, can you?!?

Jim L wrote:
While posts are there proclaiming how loud 'we' are and how much 'we' are going to drink at the convention, 'we' need to remember, I'd think, that the quiet guy who doesn't drink and is shy might be discouraged from attending the convention or even posting an important question to the board. That is a far bigger tragedy than any bickering here.

Just for the record, I was one of those quiet guys who doesn't drink much and is shy, and I was lurking here for quite some time before I posted. As I read the threads, I felt a genuine sense of camaraderie here, and I finally found myself posting. Now I post regularly, and I am very interested in coming to the convention. So, this "argument" of yours is a bit of a moot point.

Randy
Cincinnati, OH
SAHD to Ryder (23 months)



JPhillip
JPhillip's picture
Posts: 646
Joined: 2006-11-17
Dad Points: 924
My vote:

Randy Fielding.



Jim L
Jim L's picture
Posts: 118
Joined: 2006-11-12
Dad Points: 153
.

randyfielding wrote:

Jim L wrote:
I am for the free exchange of ideas/opinions/whatever. I am not for the extreme/potentially controversial opinions headlining the main page under 'What's New at AHD.org'.

Do you not see how you are constantly contradicting yourself in your own thoughts. You can't have it both ways, my friend.

I am sure that you are wrong here. There is a difference between what is allowed in a forum and what is 'Advertised' as site content on the Main Page. The Sex Toy thread is tame and civil, but could be offensive. What if a radical conservative extremist bigot SAHD made a thread "When Will G-D Smite the Homosexuals?" or "Should the Blacks be sent Back?" Would you want those messages up in lights on the main page? I hope not, but the way it is now, that is what would happen. And as everyone jumps in to berate this guy, they bump the post and it stays in the headlines until Mike is notified.

If there is a mod watching, this is stopped. Sure this is extreme, and the line should be appropriately drawn. Maybe only the forums like AHD News, Dads Helping Dads, or Convention News feed the frame on the main page. The Sex and Relationship forum can thrive as a forum without the thread titles represented as what AHD.org is. Properly divided and titled forums allow for more freedom of discussion, not less -- anyone jumping in there should know what to expect.

randyfielding wrote:

Jim L wrote:
From the beginning, I and others were led to believe that this was the site somehow chosen to replace Slowlane as the main presence of the SAHD community on the internet. ... Regarding the polls, the responses are low, and by the people who have been having the conversations.

So you were sold on something that didn't quite turn out the way you imagined it when the site first began? Oh well. As the site membership has grown, so has the site activity, and so has the number of opinions. Mike has most graciously made this site a democracy and given us all a voice. And, according to the polls, your opinion is in the minority. Therefore, you can continue to preach to the wind, or you can attempt to transform yourself as the forum itself transforms.

Well, not exactly. There were several options, and rather than create more division among SAHDs, at the convention, we agreed to be sending people here instead of anyplace else. The thought was it was to be THE main resource. If it is not, and it is just to be another souped up message board where anything goes, I'll drop this whole deal and move on.

I think that obtaining the dot org is another aspect that connotes some sort of service is provided here, besides message boards.

randyfielding wrote:

Jim L wrote:
I am not trying to control anything,...

I am more than happy to hear and acknowledge your opinion, but you cannot possibly be serious in saying this, can you?!?

I am serious. This is a web site I care about and it represents a cause I care about. I am offering suggestions based on experience on how this can be a better online resource for SAHDs. I know I have no power here and I could not control anything if I wanted to.

randyfielding wrote:

Jim L wrote:
While posts are there proclaiming how loud 'we' are and how much 'we' are going to drink at the convention, 'we' need to remember, I'd think, that the quiet guy who doesn't drink and is shy might be discouraged from attending the convention or even posting an important question to the board. That is a far bigger tragedy than any bickering here.

Just for the record, I was one of those quiet guys who doesn't drink much and is shy, and I was lurking here for quite some time before I posted. As I read the threads, I felt a genuine sense of camaraderie here, and I finally found myself posting. Now I post regularly, and I am very interested in coming to the convention. So, this "argument" of yours is a bit of a moot point.

Just be cause you got through it does not mean there are others who read some of that type of stuff and never give the site a second thought.



JPhillip
JPhillip's picture
Posts: 646
Joined: 2006-11-17
Dad Points: 924
For the New Guys:

He has received a lot of heat here from me and others, but it should be known that JimL is a great guy who really cares about AHDs. He is the organizer of the AHD fishing trip. And, I have enjoyed conversations with him in years past at the convention.

Keep speaking your mind, Bro.



New No.2
New No.2's picture
Posts: 478
Joined: 2007-11-12
Dad Points: 682
The fact is

Hey Guys,
The fact is that this isn't our site and if mbieweng (I think) wants to run things a certain way then it is up to us to oblige him. Clearly he wants all voices heard and opinions respected and we should all feel the same way.

We chose to come here and are not recruted. If there are new guidelines that need be followed then I will follow them and I'm sure we can all still get along, which, I belve we do at AtHomeDad than any other site I have participated in.

Be Seeing You.



Gaming with Baby
Gaming with Baby's picture
Posts: 433
Joined: 2007-08-15
Dad Points: 618
This back and forth bickering is getting ridiculous

Jim, your opinion is well known and established at this point. There's little sense in beating the dead horse. You can defend your opinion ad naseum and it won't change anything. I do, however, understand that your problem with the content as you see it is caused by the "What's on AtHomeDad.org" box and to an extent I agree that it'd better serve the public interest if something were done about it. But by the same token, that's what has driven the explosion in discussion here.

The fact of the matter is, this place is billed as an oasis for SAHDs. If that's what it is, then that's what it should remain. The only solution I see to this is a redesign of the site. I know I'm still very much an FNG around here, as are many of the others that have helped drive the explosion in posts of late, and my opinion means precisely dick, but this is the only solution I see. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe mbieweng doesn't have the ability to it, but that's the way I sees it.

And that's all I have to say about that.

-Will
http://www.gamingwithbaby.com all your diapers are belong to us
fatdadcooking.com coming soon!
my flickr



MileHiDad
MileHiDad's picture
Posts: 589
Joined: 2006-11-06
Dad Points: 1136
2 Bits Worth

I was involved in the not so famous thread about onion rings a while back and it was brought up after a while that “unwanted keywords” by search engines from the post were being used by an “unwanted element” to find something that was not there. (Old timers, isn’t that about the time the gay community paid us a visit and wanted to involved?)
So, with that said, unless you want Google to send searches looking for Dildos and other current on topic phrases to this .org, I would suggest refraining from using these said terms to any great length or giving them their own subdirectory. Mostly because search engines seem to sometimes “key” on the unflattering words in a site if they are used at great lengths and nobody here wants these keywords to send people here looking for these items.
It is my opinion that we should let them go by the wayside and move on with our jobs at hand. I am far from being prude and was going to sidestep this thread, but I am just passing on past site experience because we’ve already been there, done that…

My Site, http://www.milehidad.com/ and my Blog, http://www.milehighdad.net/, visit my online Dad store at my Blog!
Make Babies, Not War!
I Wanna Know How Forever Feels...



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.